EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Asymmetry in return and volatility spillover between China's interbank and exchange T-bond markets

Xiaoye Jin

International Review of Economics & Finance, 2015, vol. 37, issue C, 340-353

Abstract: We document asymmetry in return and volatility spillover between interbank and exchange T-bond markets in China for daily returns during the period 2006–2013 using a bivariate GARCH modeling approach. Our empirical findings suggest that return spillover is asymmetric in two aspects: the sign of the shock (good news or bad news) and the origin of the shock (interbank market or exchange market). Good news originating in the exchange market leads to higher interbank returns while bad news has no significant impact. By contrast, both good and bad news from the interbank market lead to higher exchange returns, albeit in different sizes. In relation to volatility asymmetry, exchange T-bond volatility increases are significantly higher for negative exchange T-bond return shocks than for positive ones. In contrast, interbank T-bond volatility behavior is empirically indistinguishable from a symmetric process. Furthermore, there only exists a pattern of volatility spillover from the exchange T-bond market into the interbank T-bond market.

Keywords: Interbank T-bond market; Asset pricing; Volatility asymmetry; Market spillovers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G12 G13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056014002135
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:reveco:v:37:y:2015:i:c:p:340-353

DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2014.12.005

Access Statistics for this article

International Review of Economics & Finance is currently edited by H. Beladi and C. Chen

More articles in International Review of Economics & Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().

 
Page updated 2020-05-02
Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:37:y:2015:i:c:p:340-353