EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Is the idiosyncratic volatility anomaly driven by the MAX or MIN effect? Evidence from the Chinese stock market

Xiaoyuan Wan

International Review of Economics & Finance, 2018, vol. 53, issue C, 1-15

Abstract: The literature documents that the IVOL anomaly is subsumed by the MAX effect in U.S. and European stock market. Consistent with the literature, we find strong IVOL and MAX effects in the Chinese stock market. However, we show that the IVOL anomaly is not subsumed by the MAX effect, instead the MAX effect is subsumed by the IVOL anomaly. We interpret our findings as evidence that the IVOL anomaly in the Chinese stock market is beyond the effect of typical investor behavioral biases and there are stronger limits to arbitrage in the Chinese stock market due to unique institutional settings.

Keywords: Idiosyncratic volatility anomaly; Extreme returns; Investor behavioral biases; Limits to arbitrage; The Chinese stock market (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G02 G12 G17 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056017307517
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:reveco:v:53:y:2018:i:c:p:1-15

DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2017.10.015

Access Statistics for this article

International Review of Economics & Finance is currently edited by H. Beladi and C. Chen

More articles in International Review of Economics & Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:53:y:2018:i:c:p:1-15