EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Do individuals and institutions make different short selling strategies around the 52-week highs?

Mei-Chen Lin and Meng Ping Chou

International Review of Economics & Finance, 2023, vol. 88, issue C, 386-407

Abstract: In this study, we investigate whether the effects of the price proximity and timing recency of 52-week highs on short sellers' trading strategies vary with investor type. The results show individual short sellers' interpretations of price increases are influenced by the anchoring bias; thereby leading them to increase their short positions when the stock's price is close to its 52-week high. However, institutional short sellers exploit the underreaction associated with the 52-week high and decrease their short positions. Individual short sellers' biased trading brings losses to investors who mimic this trading strategy.

Keywords: Anchor bias; Recency effect; 52-Week high; Short selling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056023001958
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:reveco:v:88:y:2023:i:c:p:386-407

DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.028

Access Statistics for this article

International Review of Economics & Finance is currently edited by H. Beladi and C. Chen

More articles in International Review of Economics & Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:88:y:2023:i:c:p:386-407