The asymmetric relationships between the Bitcoin futures’ return, volatility, and trading volume

Yu-Sheng Kao, Kai Zhao, Hwei-Lin Chuang and Yu-Cheng Ku

International Review of Economics & Finance, 2024, vol. 89, issue PA, 524-542

Abstract: This study investigated the asymmetric contemporaneous and lead-lag relationships between return and trading volume as well as return volatility and volume on the Bitcoin futures by analyzing the threshold and smooth transition effects based on the logistic smooth transition regression (LSTR) model with the logistic smooth transition GJR-GARCH framework. The main findings demonstrated that the asymmetric and smooth transition effects existed in both the contemporaneous and lead-lag return-volume and volatility-volume relationships. There were also a one-trading-day to three-trading-day delayed effects from volume to return and volatility. The implication of the findings suggests that there are arbitrage opportunities for investors in the Bitcoin futures market. Furthermore, we confirm that the Mixture of Distribution Hypothesis (MDH) was a better theory than the Sequential Information Arrival Hypothesis (SIAH) in explaining the volatility-volume relationships on the Bitcoin futures. Our findings also showed that the speed of information transmission increased as it got closer to the current trading day. This evidence supported the MDH in the Bitcoin futures market.

Keywords: Trading volume; Volatility; Logistic smooth transition regression; GJR-GARCH; Bitcoin futures (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056023002216
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:reveco:v:89:y:2024:i:pa:p:524-542

DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.011

Access Statistics for this article

International Review of Economics & Finance is currently edited by H. Beladi and C. Chen

More articles in International Review of Economics & Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().