Why are pension schemes frozen, and how does a freeze affect the Employer's risk?

Zucheng Zhao and Charles Sutcliffe

International Review of Economics & Finance, 2024, vol. 94, issue C

Abstract: Defined benefit (DB) pension schemes involve substantial risks and costs for employers. So employers have frozen (or closed) their schemes. Using data on firms in the FTSE 100 index, we study the characteristics of employers who hard froze (no new members or accruals) their DB scheme, and the effect of this on the employer's risk. We find that the probability of a hard freeze is a negative function of employer size, operating cash flow and unionization; and a positive function of a previous soft freeze (no new members). We also find that a hard freeze reduces total, unsystematic and credit risk; and increases systematic and asset risk.

Keywords: Pension scheme; Freeze; Close; Employer risk; Defined benefit (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G23 G32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105905602400385X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:reveco:v:94:y:2024:i:c:s105905602400385x

DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.103393

Access Statistics for this article

International Review of Economics & Finance is currently edited by H. Beladi and C. Chen

More articles in International Review of Economics & Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().