ESG rating disagreement: Implications and aggregation approaches

Emawtee Bissoondoyal-Bheenick, Scott Bennett, Rob Lehnherr and Angel Zhong

International Review of Economics & Finance, 2024, vol. 96, issue PA

Abstract: This study explores environmental, social and governance (ESG) rating disagreement among different providers, given the variation and lack of consensus in ESG ratings. We utilize three prominent ESG ratings (Sustainalytics, MSCI and Asset4) and employ four aggregation methods. Our analysis reveals relatively high correlations between ratings provided by Asset4 and Sustainalytics, while MSCI's ratings exhibit negative correlations with both. Further, European countries display lower ESG rating disagreement compared to other regions. This study enhances our understanding of ESG rating disagreement and emphasises the importance of considering and synthesizing multiple ratings when assessing firms' ESG performance.

Keywords: ESG ratings; Rating disagreement; Aggregation methods; Sustainability; ESG (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024005240
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:reveco:v:96:y:2024:i:pa:s1059056024005240

DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.103532

Access Statistics for this article

International Review of Economics & Finance is currently edited by H. Beladi and C. Chen

More articles in International Review of Economics & Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().