Three myths of neutrality in TA - How different forms of TA imply different understandings of neutrality

Helge Torgersen

Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, vol. 139, issue C, 57-63

Abstract: Technology Assessment (TA) is predicated on a set of basic ideas including neutrality. Over time and in various contexts, the term has been interpreted differently, giving rise to several ‘foundational myths’ of neutrality (in an understanding oriented at Roland Barthes' concept of everyday myths). Three of them pertaining to interests, arguments and factual claims are presented. They are associated with particular forms of TA emerging from the OTA experience, from the participatory turn and from the social constructivist approach. Each of these understandings has a particular political function for TA in the respective context. The ‘colonizing’ factors, respectively, that contribute to the understandings not only go along with forms of current TA but also influence how TA addresses problems with respect to factuality and normativity. To prepare for the future, TA might revisit different understandings of neutrality and make them more explicit. A more reflexive understanding might come from a re-orientation at the normative foundations of the liberal democratic and social state TA always had been based on.

Keywords: Technology assessment; Neutrality; Everyday myth; OTA; Participation; STS (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162518300817
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:139:y:2019:i:c:p:57-63

DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.025

Access Statistics for this article

Technological Forecasting and Social Change is currently edited by Fred Phillips

More articles in Technological Forecasting and Social Change from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().