Obtaining certainty vs. creating uncertainty: Does firms’ patent filing strategy work as expected?

Gupeng Zhang, Libin Xiong, Hongbo Duan and Dujuan Huang

Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, vol. 160, issue C

Abstract: Based on a dataset from China that covers 426,512 invention patents, this study investigates firms’ patent filing strategy embedded in the examination request lag and tests their effectiveness. Based on survival model and Probit model, we employ the patent renewal and invalidation data to test the market's reactions and rivals’ counteractions, respectively. The results show that to obtain certainty, firms tend to intentionally delay their examination request for potentially valuable patents. This delay may be effective in enabling the firms to obtain a higher realized value from their patent right in China. To create uncertainty for rivals, firms may intentionally delay the examination request and simultaneously file a large number of patents. Firms also tend to delay the examination request in either new technology fields or technology fields in which patent filings increase rapidly, with the intention of dealing with the external uncertainty. However, rivals may counteract these delays by appealing for patent invalidations, which may lead to an efficiency loss in the patent system. We discuss these results in the specific legal and market contexts of China.

Keywords: Patent filing strategy; Examination request lag; Invalid announcement; Patent value; Cox PH model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004016252031060X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:160:y:2020:i:c:s004016252031060x

DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120234

Access Statistics for this article

Technological Forecasting and Social Change is currently edited by Fred Phillips

More articles in Technological Forecasting and Social Change from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().