Identifying and prioritizing the barriers to green innovation in SMEs and the strategies to counteract the barriers: An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy approach

Vahideh Shahin, Moslem Alimohammadlou and Abbas Abbasi

Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2024, vol. 204, issue C

Abstract: Increasing environmental burdens and the importance of innovation in the presently competitive environment have encouraged small- and mid-size enterprises (SMEs) to adopt and implement green innovation practices. This process, however, is faced with many limitations and obstacles. The purpose of this study is to propose a framework to identify barriers to green innovation in SMEs and to provide solutions/strategies to overcome such barriers. Using the systematic literature review (SLR) method and the opinions of 20 experts, the study primarily identified 29 sub-categories of barriers falling under seven main categories including “management”, “organization”, “human resources”, “financial resources”, “external cooperation”, “customers, markets or competitors”, and “the external environment.” Similarly, 22 strategies were discovered that could help to counteract the barriers identified. To determine the weights of the barriers, the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multiplicative Best-Worst Method (IFMBWM) was used. The strategies, too, were ranked through the Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy MULTIMOORA (IVIF-MULTIMOORA) method. Then, a sensitivity analysis and a comparative analysis were applied to confirm the robustness of the proposed method and ensure the consistency of the obtained ranking of alternatives. As the results revealed, the optimal and effective solutions that could be used by policy-makers/managers to overcome the barriers to green innovation were “simplifying authorization and licensing procedures”, “effective environmental laws and regulations”, “shared responsibility throughout the supply chain”, “a supportive organizational culture”, and “merit-based selection of managers.”

Keywords: Green innovation; Intuitionistic fuzzy sets; Systematic literature review; MULTIMOORA; Best-worst method (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004016252400204X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:204:y:2024:i:c:s004016252400204x

DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123408

Access Statistics for this article

Technological Forecasting and Social Change is currently edited by Fred Phillips

More articles in Technological Forecasting and Social Change from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().