Restating modal investment priority with an improved model for public transport analysis
Alejandro Tirachini,
David Hensher and
Sergio Jara-Diaz ()
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2010, vol. 46, issue 6, 1148-1168
Abstract:
We compare analytically and numerically the optimised performance of different urban public transport modes for three objectives: total cost minimisation, profit maximisation, and welfare maximisation. We find that under optimal operation, buses provide lower waiting time and operator costs, therefore the only possible advantage for rail is providing a lower in-vehicle time cost if trains are faster. Using Australian data, we found that bus rapid transit provides a lower total cost, higher profit and welfare, up to their capacity. Introducing passengers dislike of crowding and train-specific attraction elements might make Heavy Rail the most cost effective mode for high levels of demand.
Keywords: Bus; Rail; BRT; Users; costs; Operator; costs; Crowding (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (30)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554510000190
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:transe:v:46:y:2010:i:6:p:1148-1168
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 600244/bibliographic
Access Statistics for this article
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is currently edited by W. Talley
More articles in Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().