How Should MDG Success and Failure be Judged: Faster Progress or Achieving the Targets?

Sakiko Fukuda-Parr (), Joshua Greenstein and David Stewart

World Development, 2013, vol. 41, issue C, 19-30

Abstract: This paper addresses the debate about the use of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) as performance measures in three ways. First we clarify the concept; like other global goals, the MDGs are benchmarks for gauging progress toward important objectives and should not be treated as planning goals. Second, when used as measures of national performance, the criterion of success should focus on the pace of progress rather than on achieving the targets. Third, we propose an alternative measurement method and find that with this metric, countries of Africa outperform global averages in progress to achieving the MDG targets.

Keywords: poverty; millennium development goals; global goals; accountability; monitoring methodology; Africa (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (35)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X12001829
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: How Should MDG Implementation Be Measured: Faster Progress or Meeting Targets? (2010)
Working Paper: How should MDG Implementation be Measured: Faster Progress or Meeting Targets? (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:41:y:2013:i:c:p:19-30

DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.06.014

Access Statistics for this article

World Development is currently edited by O. T. Coomes

More articles in World Development from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().