The return of Ulysses´: Notes on the Logic of Plans and Commitments
Ana Bianchi () and
Roberta Muramatsu ()
Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 2005, vol. 25, issue 2, 23-44
Abstract:
This paper criticizes the conventional theory of choice for being grounded on a minimal set of rationality axioms. We claim that this theory does not take due account of the fact that agents are driven by motives other than the pursuit of material self-interest. Our departure point is logic of commitments and planned action, which helps us to identify some puzzles in the conventional theory of choice. As a way out, we discuss the Kantian perspective and the notions of metapreference and metaranking. We then build a model of choice which points to the possibility of a systematic treatment of higher order preferences and incommensurable objectives. JEL Classification: B41, D01.
Keywords: Rationality; Commitments; Metapreferences (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/ind ... article/view/629/627 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:25:y:2005:i:2:p:23-44:id:629
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Brazilian Journal of Political Economy from Center of Political Economy
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Brazilian Journal of Political Economy (Brazil) ().