EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Globalization in Brazil: responsible or spacegoat?

Paul Kliass () and Pierre Salama ()

Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 2008, vol. 28, issue 3, 371-391

Abstract: After the sequence of structural adjustments decisions suggested by the IMF, Brazilian economy became wider opened, as the consequences from financial globalization were stronger than those from commercial globalization. Nevertheless, social and economical reality didn’t show much improvement. On the contrary, figures on economic increase and inequalities show Brazil behind the average of developing countries. Even if the effects caused by “mondialisation” on weakened economies are well known, globalization can not be taken as the only guilty of weak economic increase, for maintaining the high level of inequalities or for the increase of precariousness. Responsibility must be searched on high inequalities in where operates “mondialisation”, on weakness of public policies, on irresponsible way of opening of the economy and in fiscal policy in favor of financial sector. Other countries have reached quite different results, once the have adopted different public policies, which goal was to establish control and reduction upon the negatives effects of globalization. JEL Classification: O11; O19.

Keywords: Brazil; mondialisation; globalisation; inequalities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/ind ... article/view/532/530 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:28:y:2008:i:3:p:371-391:id:532

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Brazilian Journal of Political Economy from Center of Political Economy
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Brazilian Journal of Political Economy (Brazil) ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:28:y:2008:i:3:p:371-391:id:532