Ricardian Equivalence revisited: introductory notes
Maria Isabel Busato ()
Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 2022, vol. 42, issue 1, 113-127
Abstract:
These notes aim to revisit the debate, the model, the results, and main objectionsto the validity of the Ricardian Equivalence Theorem as presented in Barro (1974). Itis intended to explore his thesis that tax and debt are equivalent and have no real effect onperceived wealth, demand, the real interest rate or on the economy. The thesis refers to theanalysis of the ways of financing debt at a given level of government expenditure and doesnot address the effects of an expansion of this volume of spending, nor it specifically analyzesthe effects of an increase in public debt due to a tax reduction policy. After this presentation,the thesis is debated, consolidating some of the premises that are necessary to validate it. The purpose of the paper is to explore the first round of debates on the theme,explaining the restrictions to which the Barro-Ricardo Theorem or the Ricardian EquivalenceTheorem is subject, based on the publications by Barro (1976), Buchanan (1976) andFeldstein (1976), all of them within the ‘realm’ of economic orthodoxy. The final sectionpresents some remarks and an analysis of Barro’s later work (1989 and 1996). JEL Classification: E00; E13; E21; E62.
Keywords: Ricardian Equivalence; Barro-Ricardo Theorem (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/ind ... ticle/view/2299/2260 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:42:y:2022:i:1:p:113-127:id:2299
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Brazilian Journal of Political Economy from Center of Political Economy
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Brazilian Journal of Political Economy (Brazil) ().