Unemployment: natural rate epicycles or hysteresis?

Rod Cross

European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 2014, vol. 11, issue 2, 136-148

Abstract: This paper argues that the natural rate of unemployment hypothesis, in which equilibrium unemployment is determined by ‘structural’ variables alone, is wrong: it is both implausible and inconsistent with the evidence. Instead, equilibrium unemployment is haunted by hysteresis. The curious history of the natural rate hypothesis is considered, curious because the authors of the hypothesis thought hysteresis to be relevant. The various methods that have been used to model hysteresis in economic systems are outlined, including the Preisach model with its selective, erasable memory properties. The evidence regarding hysteresis effects on output and unemployment is then reviewed.

Keywords: unemployment; natural rate hypothesis; hysteresis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B22 C60 E12 E24 E31 N01 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/ejeep/11-2/ejeep.2014.02.01.xml (application/pdf)
Restricted access

Related works:
Working Paper: Unemployment: natural rate epicycles or hysteresis? (2014)
Working Paper: Unemployment: natural rate epicycles or hysteresis? (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:ejeepi:v:11:y:2014:i:2:p136-148

Access Statistics for this article

European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention is currently edited by Torsten Niechoj

More articles in European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Phillip Thompson ().