Risks of a slow-motion EMU reform

László Andor
Additional contact information
László Andor: Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary

European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 2019, vol. 16, issue 2, 226-237

Abstract: The article provides a critical assessment of how the Economic and Monetary Union was designed, implemented and reformed in the European Union and discusses the risks of a slow-motion reform process. It is argued that the fact that the euro area economy has recovered in the last few years has become a source of complacency and delays. In particular, powerful forces continue to downplay the importance of systemic reconstruction and the risk of disintegration remains high despite the relative tranquillity of markets in the 2014–2018 period. Finally, the article evaluates competing paradigms about the eurozone crisis and the pros and cons of fiscal capacity building.

Keywords: European Union; Great Recession; eurozone crisis; divergence; EMUreform; fiscal capacity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E63 F45 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/ejeep/16-2/ejeep.2019.02.07.xml (application/pdf)
Restricted Access

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:ejeepi:v:16:y:2019:i:2:p226-237

Access Statistics for this article

European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention is currently edited by Torsten Niechoj

More articles in European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Phillip Thompson ().