The case for capital account management in emerging market economies: The experiences of the BRICs
Jörg Bibow
European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 2012, vol. 9, issue 1, 57-90
Abstract:
Currency market intervention cum reserve accumulation has emerged as the favored »self-insurance« strategy in recipient countries of excessive private capital inflows. This paper argues that capital account management represents a less costly alternative line of defense deserving renewed consideration; especially in the absence of fundamental reform of the global monetary and financial order. Mainstream arguments in favor of financial globalization are found unconvincing. It is argued that any indirect benefits allegedly obtainable through hot money inflows are equally obtainable without actually tolerating such inflows. The paper investigates the experiences of Brazil, Russia, India and China (the BRICs) in the global crisis and subsequent recovery, focusing on their respective policies regarding capital flows.
Keywords: capital flows; self-insurance; capital controls; financial regulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F02 F32 F33 F39 G28 O23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.elgaronline.com/abstract/journals/ejeep/9-1/ejeep.2012.01.06.xml (application/pdf)
Restricted access
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:ejeepi:v:9:y:2012:i:1:p57-90
Access Statistics for this article
European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention is currently edited by Torsten Niechoj
More articles in European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Phillip Thompson ().