Quality of institutions and the BRIC countries agro-food exports

Štefan Bojnec (), Imre Fertő and József Fogarasi

China Agricultural Economic Review, 2014, vol. 6, issue 3, 379-394

Abstract: Purpose - – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impacts of institutional quality (IQ) in exporting and importing countries on agro-food exports from the world's leading emerging economies: Brazil, the Russian Federation, India and China (BRIC countries). Design/methodology/approach - – Measuring is based on using the gravity trade model and econometric panel data analysis for the period 1998-2009. Findings - – Agro-food exports from the BRIC countries, particularly Brazil and China, have increased. The Russian Federation has experienced stagnating and volatile patterns. Brazil and India have strengthened market shares in the existing importing markets, while the Russian Federation has experienced severe deterioration. The export of existing products is more important than of new products. Agro-food exports are positively associated withIQand the size of the gross domestic product in exporting and importing countries, but negatively with distance. Research limitations/implications - – AmongIQvariables, the focus is on the indices of legal structure and security of property rights and freedom to trade internationally in agro-food importing countries and the BRIC exporting countries. Practical implications - – Different institutions and their quality can affect agro-food exports differently. The impact of institutions is not uniform across product groups. Originality/value - – This paper adds the impacts ofIQon agro-food exports. Except for processed products for final household consumption, agro-food exports from the BRIC countries are positively associated with the quality of the legal structure, the security of property rights and the freedom to trade internationally asIQin exporting and importing countries.

Keywords: China; Comparative analysis; Agribusiness; Agricultural trade; Agricultural policy; Food policy; Agricultural institutions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:caerpp:v:6:y:2014:i:3:p:379-394

DOI: 10.1108/CAER-02-2013-0034

Access Statistics for this article

China Agricultural Economic Review is currently edited by Dr Fu Qin, Dr Jikun Huang, Dr Kevin Z Chen, Dr Weiming Tian, Prof Daniel Sumner, Prof Xian Xin and Prof Holly Wang

More articles in China Agricultural Economic Review from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().