EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Toward a theoretical and empirical distinction between perceived investment in employee development and perceived organizational support

Yuhee Jung and Norihiko Takeuchi

Evidence-based HRM, 2025, vol. 14, issue 2, 304-320

Abstract: PurposeThe aim of the study is to provide a conceptual framework for the independence of perceived investment in employee development (PIED) and perceived organizational support (POS), drawing on cognition and emotion in social information processing. The study also examines how key outcomes – fit perceptions and work attitudes – relate to PIED and POS.Design/methodology/approachTime-lagged data from 227 Korean workers were collected and analyzed to assess the associations between PIED, POS, fit perceptions and work attitudes.FindingsOur findings indicate that PIED has a significantly stronger association with fit perceptions (person-organization fit and person-job fit) than POS. In contrast, POS exhibits a stronger association with work attitudes (affective commitment and job satisfaction) than PIED.Research limitations/implicationsThis study acknowledges limitations in its generalizability due to the Korean cultural context and its focus on the manufacturing industry. Future research should replicate the study across different cultural and industrial settings. Additionally, as our findings are based on employee self-reported and time-lagged data, future studies should adopt multi-rater and fully longitudinal designs. By expanding research across diverse contexts and employing robust methodologies, further exploration of PIED and POS distinctions will enhance both theoretical understanding and practical applications.Practical implicationsThe study highlights the need for human resource (HR) managers to differentiate between PIED and POS when evaluating the return on investment of employee development and implementing strategic HR management in line with company-wide strategies.Originality/valueThis study is the first to attempt to theoretically and empirically distinguish PIED and POS. Notably, this study addresses the ongoing scholarly debate surrounding these concepts, which does not clearly distinguish between the two concepts and often conflates them with social exchange theory. The study offers meaningful theoretical advancements in understanding PIED.

Keywords: Perceived investment in employee development; Perceived organizational support; Cognition and emotion in social information processing; fit perceptions; Work attitudes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/ebhrm/article/14/2/304/124 ... mpirical-distinction (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/ebhrm/article-pdf/14/2/304 ... m-04-2024-0126en.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:ebhrmp:ebhrm-04-2024-0126

DOI: 10.1108/EBHRM-04-2024-0126

Access Statistics for this article

Evidence-based HRM is currently edited by Prof Thomas Lange

More articles in Evidence-based HRM from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().

 
Page updated 2026-11-04
Handle: RePEc:eme:ebhrmp:ebhrm-04-2024-0126