Harmonizing minds: navigating diversity in thinking and conflict management within organizational dynamics

Divya Upadhyay

Evidence-based HRM, 2024, vol. 13, issue 5, 929-944

Abstract: PurposeThe primary objective of this research paper is to investigate the fundamental dimensions of conflict management, namely cooperation (concern for self and others) and competition (concern only for self), and to establish a theoretical connection between these dimensions and reflective and intuitive thinking. Drawing upon dual process theory and Deutsch’s conceptualization of cooperation and competition, the study delves into the systematic impact of intuition and reflection on individuals’ preferred conflict management styles.Design/methodology/approachTheoretically driven hypotheses established links between reflective and intuitive thinking and cooperative and competitive conflict management styles. Two studies were conducted to empirically validate these hypotheses, designed to scrutinize the influence of intuition and reflection on individuals’ inclinations toward competitive or cooperative conflict management styles. Study 1 was based on self-reported measures, and Study 2 was an experimental design method.FindingsThe study outcomes affirm the hypotheses, revealing that reflective thinking aligns with a preference for cooperation, whereas intuitive thinking corresponds to a preference for competition.Research limitations/implicationsRecognizing the significance of cognitive styles in shaping preferences for competitive and cooperative conflict management, this research offers valuable insights for both parties involved, leading to more favorable outcomes and providing practical guidance for conflict management practitioners. The paper concludes by discussing implications and acknowledging limitations.Originality/valueThis exploration represents a novel avenue in the conflict management research domain, shedding light on the antecedents of thinking styles in the context of conflict resolution.

Keywords: Competition; Cooperation; Conflict management style; Cognitive reflection; Reflective and intuitive thinking (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/ebhrm/article/13/5/929/124 ... iversity-in-thinking (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/ebhrm/article-pdf/13/5/929 ... m-05-2024-0144en.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:ebhrmp:ebhrm-05-2024-0144

DOI: 10.1108/EBHRM-05-2024-0144

Access Statistics for this article

Evidence-based HRM is currently edited by Prof Thomas Lange

More articles in Evidence-based HRM from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().