Financial Services and Markets Tribunal rules prohibition order is appropriate

Joanna Gray

Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 2006, vol. 14, issue 3, 311-315

Abstract: Purpose - To report and comment on the tribunal case Jonathan Milnroy Townrow v. Financial Services Authority. Design/methodology/approach - Outlines the facts and explains the decision. Findings - Shows that, even though this was an extreme case, it is likely that any Tribunal would have reached the same outcome on the evidence provided. Originality/value - Provides a useful commentary on regulated activities of retail investment advisors and other financial investments.

Keywords: Law courts; Law; Financial control; Legal decisions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:jfrcpp:13581980610685676

DOI: 10.1108/13581980610685676

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance is currently edited by Prof John Ashton

More articles in Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().