Carrots and sticks in bank governance: time for a bigger stick?
Richard Ridyard
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 2019, vol. 28, issue 4, 527-539
Abstract:
Purpose - This paper aims to investigate how bank governance can be altered to reduce risk taking and engender greater financial stability. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews existing bank governance arrangements, contemporary challenges and alternative reforms. Findings - It is argued that recent reforms are incomplete. Greater countervailing incentives for bank managers and shareholders are required. This prompts an inquiry into the merits and demerits of four types of reform: changes to executive compensation arrangements; the introduction of a liability standard for directors; the removal of limited liability for bank shareholders; and a criminal offence for managers. Originality/value - Discussion illumines several problems with the current approach to bank governance and provides insights that can help direct future reform.
Keywords: Corporate governance; Banking system; Banking reform; Bank regulation; Banking law (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:jfrcpp:jfrc-05-2018-0084
DOI: 10.1108/JFRC-05-2018-0084
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance is currently edited by Prof John Ashton
More articles in Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().