Financial services and markets tribunal rules on application of financial promotion regime

Joanna Gray

Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 2008, vol. 16, issue 2, 192-199

Abstract: Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to describe the Financial Services and Markets Tribunal ruling on the application of the financial promotion regime, involving Fox Hayes v. Financial Services Authority. Design/methodology/approach - The paper outlines the facts surrounding the case and comments on the ruling. Findings - The Tribunal disagreed with the FSA that the applicant had acted negligently or recklessly. Originality/value - The paper highlights the lack of clarity and guidance on the part of the FSA as to exactly which firms on its list of unauthorised firms it considered as “boiler rooms” and which it did not.

Keywords: Legal decisions; Tribunals (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:jfrcpp:v:16:y:2008:i:2:p:192-199

DOI: 10.1108/13581980810869832

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance is currently edited by Prof John Ashton

More articles in Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().