FSA challenge in Court of Appeal to finding of Financial Services and Markets Tribunal on question of whether solicitors' firm had contravened financial promotion regime
Joanna Gray
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 2009, vol. 17, issue 3, 349-356
Abstract:
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to look at a recent Financial Services Authority (FSA) challenge in the Court of Appeal to finding of Financial Services and Markets Tribunal on question of whether solicitors' firm had contravened financial promotion regime (FSAv.Fox Hayes: Court of Appeal(civil division): Lord Justice Longmore, Lord Justice Wilson, Lord Justice Lawrence Collins). Design/methodology/approach - Examines the FSA's various grounds for appeal and what was an appropriate level of penalty. Findings - Provides the court of appeal's decisions on point of law in relation to three issues. Originality/value - This paper will be of interest to regulated firms who fear the consequences of regulatory liability for breaches of FSA rules.
Keywords: United Kingdom; Legislation; Financial services; Regulation; Solicitors (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:jfrcpp:v:17:y:2009:i:3:p:349-356
DOI: 10.1108/13581980910972278
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance is currently edited by Prof John Ashton
More articles in Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().