Distance-to-default measures and determinants for systemically important financial institutions

Natalya A. Schenck

Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 2014, vol. 22, issue 2, 159-172

Abstract: Purpose - – This study aims to compare two distance-to-default methods, data-transformed maximum likelihood estimation and “naïve”, that are suitable for financial institutions. The links between these measures and asset size, Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital ratios, non-performing assets and operating efficiency have been examined and an alternative default risk measure has been introduced. Most of the market-based distance-to-default measures are not appropriate for banks due to their unique debt structure. Design/methodology/approach - – The author has compared two distance-to-default measures and has identified their accounting determinants using Pearson’s correlation and regressions with clustered standard errors. The sample of the US-based systemically important financial institutions covers the period from 2000 to 2010. Findings - – Non-performing assets and operating efficiency are found to be statistically and economically significant determinants of both distance-to-default measures. Tier 1 capital ratio is not a significant indicator of default risk. Practical implications - – The results emphasize the importance of using a combination of market-based default risk measures and accounting ratios in default prediction models for the financial institutions. Originality/value - – This paper identifies accounting determinants of two distance-to-default measures for large financial institutions, before and during the 2008 financial crisis. It introduces a spread between two measures as an alternative default risk indicator.

Keywords: Financial crisis; Banks; Distance-to-default; Default risk; G21; G28; G32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:jfrcpp:v:22:y:2014:i:2:p:159-172

DOI: 10.1108/JFRC-02-2013-0004

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance is currently edited by Prof John Ashton

More articles in Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().