Healing from Doubt or Hardening Beliefs? The Impact of Cartesian Method Pedagogy on Student Epistemic Beliefs and Academic Self-Efficacy

Stanley Tweyman
Additional contact information
Stanley Tweyman: Department of Philosophy, York University

European Journal of Social Science Education and Research Articles, 2025, vol. 12

Abstract: This study investigates the pedagogical impact of René Descartes’ method of analysis on higher education students. The central inquiry is whether teaching this method fosters robust, self-reliant inquiry or inadvertently promotes epistemic rigidity. A quasi-experimental, pre-test/post-test design was employed with 180 undergraduate philosophy students across three groups: a Cartesian Method group, a Collaborative Inquiry group, and a Control group. Over an 8-week intervention, we measured changes in epistemic beliefs (certainty, source, justification) and academic self-efficacy using validated scales. Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) revealed that the Cartesian Method group showed significant gains in academic self-efficacy for logical argumentation. However, this group also developed stronger beliefs in knowledge certainty and individual intuition as a source of truth, alongside a diminished appreciation for knowledge derived from collaboration or empirical evidence. These findings suggest that while Cartesian pedagogy can bolster confidence in individual reasoning, it risks fostering absolutist epistemic stances, highlighting a critical trade-off for educators designing critical thinking curricula.

Keywords: Cartesian Method; Epistemic Beliefs; Academic Self-Efficacy; Philosophy Pedagogy; Critical Thinking; Descartes; Higher Education; Individualism; Collaborative Learning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://revistia.com/index.php/ejser/article/view/3372 (text/html)
https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejser_v12_i3_25/Tweyman.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eur:ejserj:379

DOI: 10.26417/bggkqy20

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in European Journal of Social Science Education and Research Articles from Revistia Research and Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Revistia Research and Publishing ().