Rakabet Hukukunda Temel Yaklaşımlar: Chicago ve Harvard Okullarının Karşılaştırılması

Ali Özdemir
Additional contact information
Ali Özdemir: Abant Izzet Baysal University

Ekonomik Yaklasim, 2004, vol. 15, issue 50, 99-113

Date: 2004
Note: [English Title] Not available [English Abstract] The debate on campetition law has gained momentum asa result af recent world-wide developments namely the demise of the Soviet Union, globalisation and neo-liberal politics. The new world order has led to an expansion of commerce and trade. Additionally, it has significantly favoured the already well-known concepts of capitalism, such as freedom of trade, free access to markets, and freedom of choice. These developments have strongly challenged the traditional interventionist perception of antitrust and favoured an approach which is confined by liberal economics. These two rival approaches mainly find their definitions in the studies af the Harvard and the Chicago Schools. Thereforean analysis of the explanation of competition law would be incomplete without same discussion of these two significant schools in the history of antitrust law. This study aims to compare the approach of the Harvard School and Chicago school to antitrust policy. [English Keywords] Not available
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ey.10412 (application/pdf)
No restriction for articles.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eyd:eyjrnl:v:15:y:2004:i:50:p:99-113

Access Statistics for this article

Ekonomik Yaklasim is currently edited by Ozan Eruygur

More articles in Ekonomik Yaklasim from Ekonomik Yaklasim Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ozan Eruygur ().