Is the “invisible hand” still relevant?

Stephen LeRoy

FRBSF Economic Letter, 2010, issue may3

Abstract: The single most important proposition in economic theory, first stated by Adam Smith, is that competitive markets do a good job allocating resources. Vilfredo Pareto?s later formulation was more precise than Smith?s, and also highlighted the dependence of Smith?s proposition on assumptions that may not be satisfied in the real world. The financial crisis has spurred a debate about the proper balance between markets and government and prompted some scholars to question whether the conditions assumed by Smith and Pareto are accurate for modern economies.

Keywords: Competition; Economic policy; Markets (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2010/el2010-14.html (text/html)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2010/el2010-14.html [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2010/el2010-14.html)
http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2010/el2010-14.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedfel:y:2010:i:may3:n:2010-14

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in FRBSF Economic Letter from Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Research Library ().