Methods for evaluating value-at-risk estimates

Jose Lopez

Economic Review, 1999, 3-17

Abstract: Since 1998, U.S. commercial banks with significant trading activities have been required to hold capital against their defined market risk exposure. Under the \"internal models\" approach embodied in the current regulatory guidelines, the capital charges are a function of banks' own value-at-risk (VaR) estimates. VaR estimates are simply forecasts of the maximum portfolio loss that could occur over a given holding period with a specified confidence level. Clearly, the accuracy of these VaR estimates is of concern to both banks and their regulators. ; To date, two hypothesis-testing methods for evaluating VaR estimates have been proposed, namely, the binomial and the interval forecast methods. For these tests, the null hypothesis is that the VaR estimates in question exhibit a specified property that is characteristic of accurate VaR estimates. As shown in a simulation exercise, these tests generally have low power and are thus prone to misclassifying inaccurate VaR estimates as \"acceptably accurate.\" ; An alternative evaluation method, based on regulatory loss functions, is proposed. Magnitude loss functions that assign quadratic numerical scores when observed portfolio losses exceed VaR estimates are shown to be particularly useful. Simulation results indicate that the loss function evaluation method is capable of distinguishing between VaR estimates generated by accurate and alternative VaR models. The additional information provided by this method as well as its flexibility with respect to the specification of the loss function make a reasonable case for its use in the regulatory evaluation of VaR estimates.

Keywords: Risk; Bank stocks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (65)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.frbsf.org/wp-content/uploads/3-17.pdf Full Text (text/html)

Related works:
Journal Article: Methods for evaluating value-at-risk estimates (1998)
Working Paper: Methods for evaluating value-at-risk estimates (1998)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedfer:y:1999:p:3-17:n:2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economic Review from Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Research Library ().