What Does Everything Besides the Unemployment Rate Tell Us About Labor Market Tightness?

Levi Bognar, Jason Faberman (), Elizabeth Kepner and Emma LaGuardia
Additional contact information
Levi Bognar: https://www.chicagofed.org/people/b/Levi-Bognar
Elizabeth Kepner: https://www.chicagofed.org/people/k/kepner-elizabeth
Emma LaGuardia: https://www.chicagofed.org/people/l/laguardia-emma

Chicago Fed Letter, 2023, vol. no 491, 7

Abstract: Between March 2022 and June 2023, the unemployment rate, the most commonly used gauge of labor market tightness, remained in a narrow range between 3.4% and 3.7%. Yet, over this period, nominal wage growth increased to unusually high levels and then moderated, though it remains at a historically high rate. The disparity between a relatively constant unemployment rate and large movements in nominal wage growth has led to a divide in public discourse, with some seeing low unemployment and strong wage growth as a sufficient sign of the strength of the labor market and others concerned that the consistently low unemployment rate suggests labor market strength has plateaued and might be susceptible to a rapid deterioration.

Keywords: Employment; Unemployment; Human capital; Wages; labor costs; Vacancies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E24 E30 J30 J60 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.21033/cfl-2023-491 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedhle:97520

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Chicago Fed Letter from Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lauren Wiese ().