Schumpeter vs. Minsky on the Evolution of Capitalism and Entrepreneurship

Lino Sau

Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science, 2022, vol. 56, issue 1, 245-272

Abstract: In the course of their lives, both Joseph Schumpeter and Hyman Minsky developed a theory of business cycles and of capitalist development. Minsky was influenced by Schumpeter during the period he spent at Harvard University in 1942 and he thought that Schumpeter's vision of the capitalist process required integration of the financial markets and investment behaviour: roughly speaking, Minsky's financial Keynesianism was what Schumpeter needed to complete his own theory of the development of a capitalist economy. Minsky explored an even broader historical framework during the last decade of his life: his theory of capitalist development was forged along the lines of the idea that there are many types of capitalism. In this paper, I shall focus particularly on this analysis with the endeavour to up-date his taxonomy, taking into account the process of global financialization, and comparing it with Schumpeter's previous scrutiny into the evolution of capitalism. On one hand, in fact, in his 1942 book Schumpeter stressed that in the last stages of capitalist evolution, entrepreneurship would end up in impasse, and he forecast that a socialist form of society would inevitably emerge from an equally inevitable disintegration of capitalist society. On the other hand, Minsky made it clear that the evolution of the capitalist systems is not necessarily a progressive process since speculative activity by money managers, globally conceived, may crowd out entrepreneurship and bring about profound global financial fragility. Both Schumpeter's and Minsky's theories of capitalist development continue to guide us and challenge us to explore important questions regarding the evolution of capitalism, although their analyses of this evolution showed different results.

Keywords: Slavery; Capitalism; Financialization; Crisis; Entrepreneurship (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B2 B5 E44 G01 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.annalsfondazioneluigieinaudi.it/images/LVI/2022-1-014-Sau.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Schumpeter vs. Minsky on the Evolution of Capitalism and Entrepreneurship (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fle:journl:v:56:y:2022:i:1:p:245-272

DOI: 10.26331/1179

Access Statistics for this article

Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science is currently edited by Francesco Cassata, Mario Aldo Cedrini, Roberto Marchionatti, Federica Morelli and Angela Ambrosino

More articles in Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science from Fondazione Luigi Einaudi, Torino (Italy) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mario Aldo Cedrini ().