Ethical Leadership, Ethical Climate and Integrity Violation: A Comparative Study in Saudi Arabia and Malaysia

Manal Mohammed Hamoudah, Zaleha Othman, Rashidah Abdul Rahman, Nor Azila Mohd Noor and May Alamoudi
Additional contact information
Manal Mohammed Hamoudah: Accounting Department, Faculty of Economics and Administration, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
Zaleha Othman: Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah 06010, Malaysia
Rashidah Abdul Rahman: Accounting Department, Faculty of Economics and Administration, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
Nor Azila Mohd Noor: Institute for Business Competitiveness, Standards and Sustainability Initiative (IBCSI)/School of Business Management (SBM), Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah 06010, Malaysia
May Alamoudi: Accounting Department, Faculty of Economics and Administration, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia

Administrative Sciences, 2021, vol. 11, issue 2, 1-18

Abstract: The primary aim of this study is to investigate the relationship among the ethical leadership, ethical climate and integrity violation of the local government of two countries, Saudi Arabia and Malaysia. Past studies indicate that ethical leadership and ethical climate influenced the integrity of local government. However, studies were mostly conducted in Western countries. Given the lack of comparative studies in Muslim-oriented countries, we intend to fill the gap by building upon previous studies on the relationship between ethical leadership and ethical climate and integrity violation of the local government. The study used survey to collect data from local authorities in the two nations. PLS-SEM was used to analyze the survey data. The findings demonstrated that the relationship between ethical leadership and integrity violation is not significant for Malaysians. Thus, the study assumption is not supported. By contrast, Saudi showed a different result in the relationship between ethical leadership and integrity violation; the relationship between ethical leadership and integrity violation in Saudi is negatively significant. Hence, the assumption is supported for Saudi participants. In regard to the ethical climate, results reveal that for Malaysia and Saudi, ethical climate negatively and significantly influence integrity violation. Thus, the assumption for both countries is supported. The findings of this study are useful for the practical development of local authorities as the findings provide information for the local government to safeguard against integrity violation. The findings also contribute social implications by educating organizations toward the role of ethical climate in preventing integrity violation. In addition, the study contributes to the growing interest in comparative studies.

Keywords: ethical leadership; ethical climate; integrity violation; Saudi Arabia; Malaysia; local government (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L M M0 M1 M10 M11 M12 M14 M15 M16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/2/43/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/2/43/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:43-:d:537923

Access Statistics for this article

Administrative Sciences is currently edited by Ms. Nancy Ma

More articles in Administrative Sciences from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().