Investigating the Effects of Work Intensification, Illegitimate Tasks and Psychological Detachment from Work on Work–Family Conflict

Cláudia Andrade () and Paula Costa Neves
Additional contact information
Cláudia Andrade: Escola Superior de Educação, Politécnico de Coimbra, 3030-329 Coimbra, Portugal
Paula Costa Neves: Escola Superior de Educação, Politécnico de Coimbra, 3030-329 Coimbra, Portugal

Administrative Sciences, 2025, vol. 15, issue 9, 1-12

Abstract: Technological advancements and organizational restructuring have been linked to increased work intensification through longer workdays, increased responsibility, and increased pressure to meet high standards. Work intensification can have several negative effects such as the increase in work–family conflict. Moreover, due to the demands related to work intensification, workers can be asked to perform illegitimate tasks. Since illegitimate tasks at work may be viewed by the worker as a waste of time and resources, illegitimate tasks can have a detrimental effect on workers’ morale and can impact the psychological detachment from work. The aim of the present study was to analyze the role of work intensification on work–family conflict, testing whether this relation is mediated by illegitimate tasks and psychological detachment from work. Participants (N = 480) were workers who filled out an online questionnaire that was disseminated using social media. The findings suggested that work intensification affected work–family conflict, and this relationship functioned through the two sequential mediators: illegitimate tasks and psychological detachment from work. Although past research has claimed that work intensification impacts work–family conflict, results showed that illegitimate tasks and psychological detachment from work play a critical role in this process. Practical contributions, limitations of this study and future research directions are discussed.

Keywords: work intensification; illegitimate tasks; psychological detachment from work; work–family conflict (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L M M0 M1 M10 M11 M12 M14 M15 M16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/9/354/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/9/354/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:354-:d:1745285

Access Statistics for this article

Administrative Sciences is currently edited by Ms. Nancy Ma

More articles in Administrative Sciences from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().