Sexual Appeals in Advertising: The Role of Nudity, Model Gender, and Consumer Response

Aníta Karen Sigurðardóttir, Vaka Vésteinsdóttir and Haukur Freyr Gylfason ()
Additional contact information
Aníta Karen Sigurðardóttir: School of Business, University of Iceland, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland
Vaka Vésteinsdóttir: Department of Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland
Haukur Freyr Gylfason: School of Business, University of Iceland, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland

Administrative Sciences, 2025, vol. 15, issue 9, 1-16

Abstract: This study examines whether sexual appeals, specifically nudity (body coverage) and model gender, shape consumer responses to advertising. Guided by the Elaboration Likelihood Model, we test whether these factors operate as peripheral cues when argument strength is minimal (fragrance advertising). In a 3 (model gender: male, female, both) × 2 (clothing: swimwear vs. outdoor wear) between-subjects experiment (n = 195), participants viewed one of six real advertisements from the same luxury fragrance brand featuring the same professional models. Nudity level did not affect attitudes toward the ad, brand attitude, or purchase intention. By contrast, ads depicting both a male and a female model produced small but reliable omnibus improvements in brand attitude and purchase intention relative to single-model ads; attitudes toward the ad were unaffected. Mediation tests indicated that these differences were not explained by attitude toward the ad or brand attitude, consistent with peripheral-cue processes rather than the classic ad → brand attitude sequence. Practically, the results challenge the assumption that “more nudity” is persuasive and suggest that, in low-argument contexts, gender-balanced model composition can be a modest, context-dependent cue. Advertisers should prioritize brand/category fit, pretest in the intended media environment (and locale), and expect incremental rather than large effects.

Keywords: sexual appeals; nudity in advertising; brand attitude; purchase intention; advertising effectiveness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L M M0 M1 M10 M11 M12 M14 M15 M16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/9/363/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/9/363/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:363-:d:1749387

Access Statistics for this article

Administrative Sciences is currently edited by Ms. Nancy Ma

More articles in Administrative Sciences from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().