EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Cluster Policy in the Light of Institutional Context—A Comparative Study of Transition Countries

Tine Lehmann () and Maximilian Benner
Additional contact information
Tine Lehmann: Department Business and Law, Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft (HTW) Berlin, Treskowallee 8, 10318 Berlin, Germany

Administrative Sciences, 2015, vol. 5, issue 4, 1-25

Abstract: The business environment in transition countries is often extraordinarily challenging for companies. The transition process these countries find themselves in leads to constant changes in the institutional environment. Hence, institutional voids prevail. These institutional voids cause competitive disadvantages for small and medium enterprises. Cluster policy can address these competitive disadvantages. As cluster policy generally aims at supporting companies’ competitive advantage by spurring innovation and productivity, it can help to bridge institutional voids. This article’s research question aims at analyzing and comparing cluster policies in the institutional context of two transition countries (Serbia and Tunisia) and analyzes to what extent cluster policies in these two countries are adapted to institutional voids prevailing there. The case studies offer insights into apparent difficulties of clusters in bridging formal institutional voids, as well as, notably, into the informal void of skill mismatches in the labor market. Still, for some specific voids, clusters do at least implicitly assume a bridging role. While the cluster policies examined do not explicitly target the institutional voids identified, cluster management can—in the course of time—align its service offering more closely with these voids. Bottom-up designed cluster policies can play an especially important role in such an evolution towards bridging institutional voids.

Keywords: cluster policy; transition countries; institutional context; institutional voids; Serbia; Tunisia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M M0 M1 M10 M11 M12 M14 M15 M16 L (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/5/4/188/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/5/4/188/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:5:y:2015:i:4:p:188-212:d:58097

Access Statistics for this article

Administrative Sciences is currently edited by Dr. Robert G. DelCampo

More articles in Administrative Sciences from MDPI, Open Access Journal
Bibliographic data for series maintained by XML Conversion Team ().

 
Page updated 2019-04-16
Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:5:y:2015:i:4:p:188-212:d:58097