Evaluation of Consumers’ WTP for Service Recovery in Restaurants: Waiting Time Perspective

Chung-Te Ting, Yu-Sheng Huang, Cheng-Te Lin and Szu-Chin Pan
Additional contact information
Chung-Te Ting: Department of Tourism, Food and Beverage Management, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan City 71101, Taiwan
Yu-Sheng Huang: Department of Tourism, Food and Beverage Management, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan City 71101, Taiwan
Cheng-Te Lin: Business School, Yulin Normal University, Yulin 537000, China
Szu-Chin Pan: Department of Tourism, Food and Beverage Management, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan City 71101, Taiwan

Administrative Sciences, 2019, vol. 9, issue 3, 1-18

Abstract: Restaurant service quality assessment has generally focused on the dining service. However, restaurant service begins with waiting for the meal. When service failure occurs due to a long waiting time, restaurant managers should adopt appropriate service recovery measures to retain consumers and reduce loss. This approach would allow them to mitigate customer dissatisfaction and negative impressions. In this study, we explore the importance of pre-processing service in the context of possible restaurant service crises and construct a restaurant service recovery model for willingness to pay (WTP) through the contingent valuation method (CVM) to measure the effects before and after implementing service recovery. Overall, several psychological and tangible service recovery measures are provided to enhance people’s willingness to extend their waiting time. Within our study group, relatively young participants showed a high willingness to extend their waiting time. Furthermore, the opportunity cost of high-income people in the waiting process was relatively high. Compared with psychological service recovery programs, our results show that tangible service recovery programs prompt respondents to wait for an additional ~10 min. This paper offers support for restaurant managers to manage consumer relationships.

Keywords: waiting time; service recovery; contingent valuation method (CVM) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L M M0 M1 M10 M11 M12 M14 M15 M16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/3/63/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/3/63/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:63-:d:260249

Access Statistics for this article

Administrative Sciences is currently edited by Ms. Nancy Ma

More articles in Administrative Sciences from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().