Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cut Grasslands Renovated with Full Inversion Tillage, Shallow Tillage, and Use of a Tine Drill in Nasu, Japan
Akinori Mori
Additional contact information
Akinori Mori: Grassland Function Unit, Division of Grassland Farming, Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science, NARO, 768 Senbonmatsu, Nasushiobara, Tochigi 329-2793, Japan
Agriculture, 2020, vol. 10, issue 2, 1-17
Abstract:
To restore the productivity of a deteriorated sward due to weed invasion, renovation (re-sowing) is necessary. However, the renovation method used can affect the sward’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and herbage yield. This study compared the effects of renovation using full inversion tillage (F), shallow tillage (S), or a tine drill (T) on the GHG emissions and herbage yield of a grassland in Nasu, Japan. Two adjacent grasslands were renovated in September 2015 (year 1) and 2016 (year 2). In each year, F, S, and T plots (5 m × 20 m each) were arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications and then orchardgrass ( Dactylis glomerata L.) was seeded. All plots received 40 kg-N ha −1 for renovation and 190 kg-N ha −1 y −1 the following year. Carbon balance (i.e., the difference between C input through crop residue and C output through heterotrophic respiration), methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions, and herbage yield were measured over a period of 411 or 412 days. Cumulative N 2 O emissions were significantly smaller from F and S plots than from T plots, however, there was no significant difference in the sum of GHG emissions (i.e., C balance plus cumulative CH 4 and N 2 O emissions) among F, S, and T plots. The cumulative total herbage yields of the F, S, and T plots did not differ significantly from each other. Consequently, the GHG intensity—i.e., the sum of GHG emissions per cumulative total herbage yield—was not significantly different among the F, S, and T plots.
Keywords: carbon dioxide; greenhouse gas intensity; heterotrophic respiration; methane; nitrous oxide; plowing; re-sowing; soil carbon; tillage; volcanic soil (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/2/31/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/2/31/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:31-:d:312827
Access Statistics for this article
Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan
More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().