EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Effect of Stocking Density on Behavior and Pen Cleanliness of Grouped Growing Pigs

Yaqiong Zeng, Hao Wang, Rongdan Ruan, Yongzhen Li, Zuohua Liu, Chaoyuan Wang and Anfang Liu
Additional contact information
Yaqiong Zeng: Chongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China
Hao Wang: Chongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China
Rongdan Ruan: Pu’er Municipal Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Pu’er 665999, China
Yongzhen Li: Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in Structure and Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100083, China
Zuohua Liu: Chongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China
Chaoyuan Wang: Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in Structure and Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100083, China
Anfang Liu: College of Animal Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 402460, China

Agriculture, 2022, vol. 12, issue 3, 1-11

Abstract: In recent years, animal cleanliness during production has gradually attracted increasing attention. Although pigs by nature tend to excrete in dark and humid corners, in the prevalent highly intensive pig production, excessive stocking density often restricts the ability of pigs to excrete at designated points, thereby leading to pollution of the pens. To study the effect of stocking density on pen cleanliness and the relevant pig behavior, a total of 216 Landrace × Yorkshire × Duroc hybrid pigs were randomly grouped at 0.5, 0.7, or 0.9 m 2 per pig at 59 ± 3 days of age. The temporal and spatial distributions of lying and excreting behavior of pigs were monitored on days 1, 7, and 35 after transfer, and the cleanliness of pig pens under three stocking densities was scored. The results showed that there were no significant differences in excreting or lying time rhythms among the three treatments. In the initial and stable periods of group transfer, the excretion rate of pigs on slatted floors was significantly higher than that on solid floors at 0.9 m 2 /pig ( p < 0.01). During the group stabilization stage and at the end of the experiment, the lying rate of pigs on solid floors under 0.9 m 2 /pig was 10.81%, that is, 7.43% higher than that of 0.7 m 2 /pig, and the differences were significant. Judging from the pollution score of the solid floors, the three stocking densities all showed more serious pollution at the corners, and the pollution score of the pens with a density of 0.9 m 2 /pig was lower than that of the pens with a density of 0.5 and 0.7 m 2 /pig. The analysis of whether pigs had corresponding behaviors in specific functional areas showed that pigs at a density of 0.9 m 2 /pig had a 10.14% lower lying rate on slatted floors (the expected excretion area) than on solid floors, whereas the densities of 0.5 and 0.7 m 2 /pig showed the opposite pattern. Pigs at a density of 0.9 m 2 /pig had lower excretion rates in both corners of the solid floors (the desired lying area) than that of the 0.5 m 2 /pig group ( p < 0.05) and 0.7 m 2 /pig group ( p > 0.05). These results indicate that when the effective occupied space of pigs was larger, specific behaviors were more likely to occur in the set functional areas, and the cleanliness of the pen was higher. Under the conditions of this experiment, the recommended stocking density for growing pigs was 0.9 m 2 /pig. Of course, a larger space may be more beneficial to animal health and welfare, but the economic costs must also be considered.

Keywords: stocking density; pen cleanliness; excretion behavior; lying behavior (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/3/418/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/3/418/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:418-:d:772264

Access Statistics for this article

Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan

More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:418-:d:772264