Risk Factor Assessment of the Smallholder Baby Vegetable Production in Eswatini

Daisy Delsile Dlamini, Jethro Zuwarimwe, Joseph Francis and Godwin R. A. Mchau
Additional contact information
Daisy Delsile Dlamini: Institute for Rural Development, School of Agriculture, University of Venda, X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa
Jethro Zuwarimwe: Institute for Rural Development, School of Agriculture, University of Venda, X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa
Joseph Francis: Institute for Rural Development, School of Agriculture, University of Venda, X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa
Godwin R. A. Mchau: Institute for Rural Development, School of Agriculture, University of Venda, X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa

Agriculture, 2022, vol. 12, issue 5, 1-11

Abstract: The transition from subsistence to commercial production poses uncertainty and risks that require putting in place adaptive systems. Such systems are imperative for agricultural production where weather and food markets are always changing. Disregarding risk factors has a cumulative negative impact on the intended outcomes. The marginality of smallholder farmers’ operational environment renders them limited to strive without government interventions. Research has proven that smallholder farmers face numerous challenges in vegetable value chains. The study sought to identify and characterise smallholder growers risk factors when producing for this value chain. A sequential mixed-method research design was adopted, and data collected from fifty-eight growers from three producer groups in the Manzini and Hhohho regions. Discriminant analysis validated the heterogeneity of respondents using the experience on risk factors. The growers were significantly affected by market and production risks. The clustered growers had a high probability of losses in the value of the harvest whereas the private growers had a high probability of yield changes. Fruit size and postharvest handling contributed to changes in the value of the harvest. An improved cold chain system could enable symmetry in the harvest scheduling and grade information as well as prompt payments. Interventions toward enabling access and use of quality farm inputs would curb yield variations. Future research could quantify yield losses at each stage of postharvest handling toward informing the risk management strategy.

Keywords: smallholder farming; risk factor; heterogeneity; enterprise; market; production (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/5/643/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/5/643/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:5:p:643-:d:805292

Access Statistics for this article

Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan

More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().