No-Till Mitigates SOC Losses after Grassland Renovation and Conversion to Silage Maize

Josue De Los Rios (), Arne Poyda, Friedhelm Taube, Christof Kluß, Ralf Loges and Thorsten Reinsch
Additional contact information
Josue De Los Rios: Institute of Crop Sciences and Plant Breeding, Grass and Forage Sciences/Organic Agriculture, Christian-Albrechts-University, Hermann-Rodewald-Straße9, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
Arne Poyda: Institute of Crop Sciences and Plant Breeding, Grass and Forage Sciences/Organic Agriculture, Christian-Albrechts-University, Hermann-Rodewald-Straße9, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
Friedhelm Taube: Institute of Crop Sciences and Plant Breeding, Grass and Forage Sciences/Organic Agriculture, Christian-Albrechts-University, Hermann-Rodewald-Straße9, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
Christof Kluß: Institute of Crop Sciences and Plant Breeding, Grass and Forage Sciences/Organic Agriculture, Christian-Albrechts-University, Hermann-Rodewald-Straße9, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
Ralf Loges: Institute of Crop Sciences and Plant Breeding, Grass and Forage Sciences/Organic Agriculture, Christian-Albrechts-University, Hermann-Rodewald-Straße9, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
Thorsten Reinsch: Institute of Crop Sciences and Plant Breeding, Grass and Forage Sciences/Organic Agriculture, Christian-Albrechts-University, Hermann-Rodewald-Straße9, D-24118 Kiel, Germany

Agriculture, 2022, vol. 12, issue 8, 1-15

Abstract: Many studies recommend no-till (NT) to increase soil organic carbon (SOC) in the topsoil (<30 cm) of arable land to counterbalance greenhouse gas emissions. Its potential use to mitigate SOC losses during conversion and renovation of grassland ecosystems in the top meter soil is yet to be determined. The SOC dynamics of a 10-year-old grassland converted to silage maize (CM) and renovated and seeded (GR) using either conventional tillage (CT) or NT were compared to an undisturbed grassland control (GC) for 7 years, across three fixed soil depth increments (0–30, 30–60, 60–90 cm). The annual C inputs (C input ) from crop residues were further analyzed. The systems were either non-fertilized (N0) or fertilized with mineral N (N1) according to a demand of 180 and 380 kg N ha −1 year −1 in the silage maize and grassland systems, respectively. For the 7-year period, the renovated grassland using NT ensured maintenance of the initial SOC in the topsoil, while a conversion toward arable cropping resulted in SOC losses, regardless of the tillage method. The use of NT during conversion significantly reduced these losses from 2.5 Mg ha −1 year −1 to 1.8 Mg ha −1 year −1 , for a 28% reduction compared to CT. In the subsoil (30–90 cm), SOC remained stable and was not affected by the cropping systems nor by the tillage method. Reduced annual C input was found as the main factor affecting SOC losses after grassland removal, regardless of the tillage method. Our findings highlight the potential of NT to mitigate annual SOC losses after grassland conversion if annual C input remains high.

Keywords: land use change; conservation tillage; climate change mitigation; soil carbon sequestration; soil fertility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/8/1204/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/8/1204/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:8:p:1204-:d:886295

Access Statistics for this article

Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan

More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().