Do Farming Scale and Mechanization Affect Moral Hazard in Rice Harvest Outsourcing Service in China?
Xue Qu (),
Daizo Kojima,
Laping Wu and
Mitsuyoshi Ando
Additional contact information
Xue Qu: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
Daizo Kojima: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
Mitsuyoshi Ando: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
Agriculture, 2022, vol. 12, issue 8, 1-12
Abstract:
The purchase of agricultural machinery outsourcing services creates a principal–agent relationship between farmers and service providers, where farmers are principals, and service providers are agents. Inconsistent goals and information asymmetry between two parties may induce moral hazard on the part of the agent. Based on survey data from 1106 rice farmers in China, this study uses Logit models to estimate the effect of agricultural machinery outsourcing services on harvesting operators’ work attitudes. The results are as follows. In general, work attitudes of outsourcing service operators are not as serious as those of farmers. After controlling for other factors, we find that purchasing harvest outsourcing services negatively affects the operators’ work attitudes. The results of the grouping estimation indicate that for large-scale farms, using combine harvesters increases the probability of agents displaying serious work attitudes. Propensity score matching analysis also proves the robustness of service providers’ less serious work attitudes. This study provides empirical evidence that moral hazard exists in agricultural machinery outsourcing services. Policies such as standardization of the outsourcing service market, scale management, and use of combine harvesters should be adopted to mitigate moral hazard.
Keywords: moral hazard; socialized service; mechanization; rice harvest (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/8/1205/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/8/1205/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:8:p:1205-:d:886384
Access Statistics for this article
Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan
More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().