The Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy Drives the Differentiation of Herders’ Livelihoods in Inner Mongolian Desert Grassland
Hong Chang,
Xinchao Liu,
Yu Xie,
Yahong Liu,
Wu Yang and
Jianming Niu ()
Additional contact information
Hong Chang: School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China
Xinchao Liu: Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China
Yu Xie: Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China
Yahong Liu: Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot 010031, China
Wu Yang: College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
Jianming Niu: School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China
Agriculture, 2022, vol. 12, issue 9, 1-15
Abstract:
Herders’ livelihood strategies are functions of the capitals at their disposal. Although this thesis has been proved, it has not been applied to livelihood research in the context of conservation initiatives. The Chinese government implemented the Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy (GECP) in 2011. However, the impact of the policy on herders’ livelihoods is still unclear. This study measured the variation in herders’ livelihood strategies in the desert grassland of Inner Mongolia, China, after the implementation of the GECP. This study also analyzed the impacts of livelihood capitals on the livelihood strategies, revealing the shortages of different livelihood strategies. The results showed the following: After the GECP, (1) herders’ livelihood strategies could be grouped into five types based on livelihood capitals. The livelihood capitals of herders varied greatly, resulting in large economical gaps among households with different livelihood strategies. (2) The herders’ livelihood strategies were affected by factors including the education, age, social communication, amount of livestock, income, and subsidy of the herders. (3) The main income sources of different livelihood strategies were both subsidy and livestock husbandry. In general, the GECP drives the differentiation of herders’ livelihoods remarkably. Future conservation initiatives should take the shortages of different livelihood strategies into account.
Keywords: livelihood capitals; livelihood strategies; herders; conservation policy; desert grassland (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1325/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1325/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1325-:d:899657
Access Statistics for this article
Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan
More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().