EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Three-Way Top-Cross Hybrids to Enhance Production of Forage with Improved Quality in Pearl Millet ( Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.)

Shashi Kumar Gupta (), Ponnaiah Govintharaj and Ruchika Bhardwaj
Additional contact information
Shashi Kumar Gupta: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502324, India
Ponnaiah Govintharaj: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502324, India
Ruchika Bhardwaj: Department of Plant Breeding & Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India

Agriculture, 2022, vol. 12, issue 9, 1-13

Abstract: Three-way top-cross hybrids of pearl millet were evaluated along with a popular single- cross check hybrid (PAC 981) for forage yield and quality traits under a multi-cut (three cuts) system across multiple years, seasons and sites in India. Total green forage yield (TGFY) varied from 36 to 53 t ha −1 , and two hybrids outyielded the check hybrid for both total dry forage yield (TDFY) and forage quality (CP; Crude protein, and IVOMD; In vitro organic matter digestibility) traits. A set of promising three-way top-cross hybrids evaluated along with a set of promising open-pollinated varieties (OPVs) and top-cross hybrids for forage-related traits over two years under a multi-cut system revealed that the mean TDFY of three-way top-cross hybrids was higher than the mean TDFY of top-cross hybrids, followed by OPVs. Also, three-way top-cross hybrids had higher/or at par forage quality traits such as CP and IVOMD in comparison to other types of cultivars. TDFY had no correlation with CP and IVOMD across cuts in three-way top-cross hybrids, indicating that forage quantity and quality traits can be improved independently of each other. Overall, three-way top-cross hybrids were found to be a better pearl millet cultivar option than other types of cultivars.

Keywords: open-pollinated varieties; top-cross hybrids; three-way top-cross hybrids; forage yield; forage quality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1508/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1508/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1508-:d:918957

Access Statistics for this article

Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan

More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1508-:d:918957