EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Integrating Agro-Morpho-Physiological Traits and SSR Markers for Detecting the Salt Tolerance of Advanced Spring Wheat Lines under Field Conditions

Muhammad Bilawal Junaid, Salah El-Hendawy (), Ibrahim Al-Ashkar, Nasser Al-Suhaibani and Majed Alotaibi
Additional contact information
Muhammad Bilawal Junaid: Department of Plant Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
Salah El-Hendawy: Department of Plant Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
Ibrahim Al-Ashkar: Department of Plant Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
Nasser Al-Suhaibani: Department of Plant Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
Majed Alotaibi: Department of Plant Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia

Agriculture, 2023, vol. 13, issue 11, 1-28

Abstract: To successfully enhance the salt tolerance of genotypes, it is crucial to conduct field-based trials, establish effective screening criteria and analysis tools, evaluate salt tolerance at various growth stages, and integrate phenotypic assessment-based traits with molecular markers. This study aimed to assess the salt tolerance of 16 F8 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) and eight genotypes by analyzing 13 agro-morpho-physiological traits using various analysis tools and SSR markers under both control and high salinity levels (15 dS m −1 ) in real field conditions. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), comparison of mean values, calculation of reduction percentage, and multivariate analysis were used to compare the assessed traits among genotypes and identify which traits are the most effective ones in describing the salt tolerance of these genotypes. A heatmap cluster analysis (HMCA) was also employed to categorize the salt tolerance of genotypes into different clusters based on the stress tolerance index (STI) for all traits. The ANOVA results revealed significant statistical differences ( p ≤ 0.05) between the genotypes and salinity levels for all assessed traits in each season and their combined data. Moreover, the 150 mM NaCl treatment led to decreases in the assessed traits by 10.2% to 36.9% when compared to the control treatments. Furthermore, the mean values of assessed traits for certain genotypes were approximately one to three times greater than those of other genotypes. Principal component analysis has identified plant dry weight, green leaf area, leaf area index, and grain yield per hectare as effective screening criteria for explaining the substantial variation observed among the genotypes. The HMCA successfully grouped genotypes into three distinct clusters and distinguished the salt-tolerant genotypes from the salt-sensitive and intermediate ones. The 24 genotypes/RILs were classified into three main groups according to the allelic data of 40 SSRs associated with salt-tolerant genes. A weak yet significant correlation was observed between the similarity coefficients of agro-morpho-physiological traits and SSR markers, as determined by the Mantel test (r = 0.13, p < 0.03, and alpha = 0.05). In conclusion, this study has successfully identified several traits, particularly those associated with SSR markers, that greatly contribute to our understanding of the phenotypic and genotypic basis influencing the salt tolerance of wheat genotypes in real field conditions. Consequently, assessing these traits for a large number of wheat plant materials in a rapid and cost-effective manner will be greatly importance in breeding programs aimed at improving salt stress tolerance in this vital food crop. This will be the main focus of our forthcoming research.

Keywords: chlorophyll content; mantel test; multivariate analysis; relative water content; saline water; stress tolerance index; yield components (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/11/2135/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/11/2135/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:11:p:2135-:d:1278722

Access Statistics for this article

Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan

More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:11:p:2135-:d:1278722