Differences in CO 2 Emissions on a Bare-Drained Peat Area in Sarawak, Malaysia, Based on Different Measurement Techniques

Hasimah Mos, Mohd Haniff Harun, Nur Maisarah Jantan, Zulkifli Hashim, Anis Suriani Ibrahim and Yusri Yusup ()
Additional contact information
Hasimah Mos: Malaysian Palm Oil Board, No. 6, Persiaran Institusi Bandar Baru Bangi, Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia
Mohd Haniff Harun: Independent Researcher, Bangi 43000, Selangor, Malaysia
Nur Maisarah Jantan: Malaysian Palm Oil Board, No. 6, Persiaran Institusi Bandar Baru Bangi, Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia
Zulkifli Hashim: Malaysian Palm Oil Board, No. 6, Persiaran Institusi Bandar Baru Bangi, Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia
Anis Suriani Ibrahim: Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Sg. Chuchuh, Arau, Jalan Wang Ulu, Kangar 01000, Perlis, Malaysia
Yusri Yusup: Environmental Technology Division, School of Industrial Technology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia

Agriculture, 2023, vol. 13, issue 3, 1-17

Abstract: The drainage and cultivation of peatlands will lead to subsidence and mineralisation of organic matter, increasing carbon (C) loss as more CO 2 is emitted. There is little information about carbon emissions from bare peat soil. A study was undertaken to measure the CO 2 emissions from a logged-over peat swamp area that was purposely vegetation-free. We aimed to report CO 2 emissions from a bare, drained peatland developed for an oil palm plantation. For 12 months, we used eddy covariance (EC), closed chambers, and soil subsidence measurements to derive CO 2 emissions from a logged-over peat swamp area. Significant variations in the estimated soil CO 2 efflux were observed in the three tested measurement techniques. The average CO 2 flux rate measured by the EC technique was 4.94 ± 0.12 µmol CO 2 m −2 s −1 (or 68.55 tonnes CO 2 ha −1 year −1 ). Meanwhile, the soil CO 2 efflux rate measured by the closed chamber technique was 4.19 ± 0.22 µmol CO 2 m −2 s −1 (or 58.14 tonnes CO 2 ha −1 year −1 ). Subsidence amounted to 1.9 cm year −1 , corresponding to 36.12 tonnes CO 2 ha −1 year −1 . The estimation of the C loss was found to be highest by the EC technique, lower by the soil chamber technique, and lowest by the peat subsidence rate technique. The higher CO 2 emission rate observed in the EC technique could be attributed to soil microbial respiration and decomposing woody residues in the nearby stacking rows due to the large EC footprint. It could also be affected by CO 2 advection from oil palms adjacent to the study site. Despite the large differences in the CO 2 emission rates by the different techniques, this study provides valuable information on the soil heterotrophic respiration of deep peat in Sarawak. Carbon emissions from a bare peat area cover only a fraction of the soil CO 2 respiration component, i.e., the soil heterotrophic respiration. Further investigations are needed to determine the CO 2 emissions by soil microbial activities and plant roots from other peat areas in Sarawak.

Keywords: soil CO 2 emissions; peat subsidence; closed chamber; eddy covariance; tropical peat; heterotrophic respiration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/3/622/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/3/622/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:622-:d:1088112

Access Statistics for this article

Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan

More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().