EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Different Nutritional Regimes in a Tomato Soilless System Affect the Bacterial Communities with Consequences on the Crop Quality

Luciano Beneduce (), Federica Piergiacomo and Kalina Sikorska-Zimny
Additional contact information
Luciano Beneduce: Department of Agriculture, Food, Natural Resources and Engineering (DAFNE), University of Foggia, Via Napoli 25, 71122 Foggia, Italy
Federica Piergiacomo: Department of Agriculture, Food, Natural Resources and Engineering (DAFNE), University of Foggia, Via Napoli 25, 71122 Foggia, Italy
Kalina Sikorska-Zimny: Fruit and Vegetables Storage and Processing Department, Division of Fruit and Vegetable Storage and Postharvest Physiology, The Institute of Horticulture—National Research Institute, Konstytucji 3 Maja 1/3 Str., 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland

Agriculture, 2024, vol. 14, issue 12, 1-14

Abstract: This study investigates the impact of different nutritional regimes on the bacterial communities within the root-growing substrate of a soilless tomato production system and the effects on crop quality. The experiment was conducted with two tomato varieties, Conchita and Sweetelle, under three nutritional treatments: standard, nutrient solution with 20% increased salts and nitrogen and supplementation with the biostimulant Bio-algeen S-90. Bacterial communities in the root substrate were influenced by both the tomato variety and the nutritional regime. Sweetelle exhibited more pronounced shifts in bacterial communities compared to Conchita. An overall increase in bacterial populations with time was observed (+0.38 Log). Specifically, the 20% enhanced nutrient solution had varying effects on bacterial counts in the two tomato varieties, while the biostimulant promoted an increase in ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (+0.4 Log). Microbial community analysis highlighted the distinct impact of each nutritional regime on nitrogen-cycling bacteria, which correlated with differences in quality parameters such as the L-ascorbic acid and lycopene contents. In the first case, a decrease (25–30%) was observed, while the lycopene content decreased after harvest (−51% in Conchita variety) but was more stable in the postharvest phase (66–70% lycopene retained, only 44% in the control). This study highlights how increased sources of nutrients and the differential responses of microbial communities to nutritional regimes do not necessarily increase the crop quality and that tailored approaches are required for different tomato varieties.

Keywords: soilless systems; tomato; root microbiome; nitrogen cycle; lycopene (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/12/2254/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/12/2254/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:2254-:d:1540314

Access Statistics for this article

Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan

More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:2254-:d:1540314