A Comprehensive Analysis of Beekeeping Risks and Validation of Biosecurity Measures against Major Infectious Diseases in Apis mellifera in Europe

Alessandra De Carolis, Adam J. Newmark, Jieun Kim, Junxia Song, Marco Pietropaoli, Veronica Manara, Andrea Gyorffy, Joseph Cazier and Giovanni Formato ()
Additional contact information
Alessandra De Carolis: Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana Toscana “M. Aleandri”, Via Appia Nuova 1411, 00178 Rome, Italy
Adam J. Newmark: Department of Government and Justice Studies, Appalachian State University, 287 Rivers St., Boone, NC 28608, USA
Jieun Kim: Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy
Junxia Song: Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy
Marco Pietropaoli: Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana Toscana “M. Aleandri”, Via Appia Nuova 1411, 00178 Rome, Italy
Veronica Manara: Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana Toscana “M. Aleandri”, Via Appia Nuova 1411, 00178 Rome, Italy
Andrea Gyorffy: Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana Toscana “M. Aleandri”, Via Appia Nuova 1411, 00178 Rome, Italy
Joseph Cazier: Department of Information Systems, Arizona State University, 975 S. Myrtle Ave, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
Giovanni Formato: Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana Toscana “M. Aleandri”, Via Appia Nuova 1411, 00178 Rome, Italy

Agriculture, 2024, vol. 14, issue 3, 1-11

Abstract: Background/Objectives : In a collaborative effort, FAO, the International Federation of Beekeepers’ Association “Apimondia”, the Appalachian State University, and the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e Toscana (IZSLT), the FAO Reference Centre for Animal Health and Food Security Discipline Apiculture, health, and biosecurity, designed an online international survey (“Knowledge, Awareness and Practice”-KAP) as a risk assessment tool to validate biosecurity measures able to prevent and control the main honeybee ( Apis mellifera subsp.) infectious diseases. Methods : The KAP survey was disseminated through various channels for 14 months (January 2019–March 2020). Beekeepers’ knowledge on nosemosis, American foulbrood (AFB), and European foulbrood (EFB) management was assessed. Beekeepers’ attitudes were investigated by asking them to provide a score called “Acceptance by beekeepers”. Results : Of the 410 respondents, the majority of them (68.3%, n = 252) were from Europe. European beekeepers (n = 252) considered “Highly acceptable” the following practices: removing combs that show signs of dysentery and feeding colonies for nosemosis; the quick identification and management of affected hives for American foulbrood and European foulbrood. Instead, the following practices were considered as not acceptable by beekeepers: for nosemosis, the use of antibiotics and sampling of hive debris for early detection; for American foulbrood and European foulbrood, the shook swarm, the destruction of the whole apiary, as well as their treatment with antibiotics. Conclusion : This study demonstrated the validity of the present “Knowledge, Awareness and Practice” (KAP) survey to validate the best practices for the main infectious honeybee diseases, considering the pragmatic point of view of beekeepers. Sustainable practices for disease control are preferred by the European beekeepers. While having an adequate knowledge base for the early detection of the investigated honeybee diseases, European beekeepers tend to be aware of the health status of their hives, embracing advanced, practice-oriented training. Authors highlight that the selection of practices and their validation should be revised on a regular basis, to be adapted in a timely manner to the current infectious honeybee disease situation, in order to build up a resilient and effective stock of practices.

Keywords: biosecurity measures in beekeeping; nosemosis; American foulbrood; European foulbrood; sustainable beekeeping; KAP survey (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/3/393/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/3/393/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:393-:d:1349232

Access Statistics for this article

Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan

More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().