Optimizing an Organic Method of Sugar Beet Cultivation and Yield Gap Decrease in Northern Poland
Józef Tyburski (),
Mirosław Nowakowski,
Robert Nelke and
Marcin Żurek
Additional contact information
Józef Tyburski: Department of Agroecosystems and Horticulture, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
Mirosław Nowakowski: Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute-National Research Institute in Radzików, Bydgoszcz Division, Department of Root Crop Cultivation and Breeding Fundamentals, 85-090 Bydgoszcz, Poland
Robert Nelke: Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute-National Research Institute in Radzików, Bydgoszcz Division, Department of Root Crop Cultivation and Breeding Fundamentals, 85-090 Bydgoszcz, Poland
Marcin Żurek: Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute-National Research Institute in Radzików, Bydgoszcz Division, Department of Root Crop Cultivation and Breeding Fundamentals, 85-090 Bydgoszcz, Poland
Agriculture, 2024, vol. 14, issue 6, 1-16
Abstract:
In the period of 2016–2018, two series of field studies on organic sugar beet growing ( Beta vulgaris L.) were carried out in northern Poland on Luvisol loamy soil (medium–heavy) soil in Bałcyny and Płonne. The aim of this study was to decrease the yield gap between organic and conventional beets. Factors to increase the yield of organic beet were differentiated fertilization (cattle farmyard manure (FYM), compost, and Bioilsa) and choice of varieties (Eliska, Jampol, and Sobieski). The reference point was the conventional cultivation of the same sugar beet varieties, fertilized with manure and NPK mineral fertilizers, the prevailing standard of sugar beet cultivation in Poland. High sugar beet root yields exceeding the average yield in Poland by 25–30% were obtained in both studies, both in conventional and organic cultivation. Higher root and white sugar yields were obtained in the study conducted at Płonne (with similar soil conditions to those at Bałcyny), but they were characterized by higher temperatures during the growing season. The lowest root yields in both experiments were obtained by fertilizing the organic beet with compost (66.1 t per ha in Bałcyny and 78.13 t per ha in Płonne), which were 10.8% and 8.5% lower than the conventional crop, respectively. Higher root yields in organic cultivation were obtained by fertilizing the sugar beet with FYM, which reduced the differences from conventional beet to 7.7% in the study in Bałcyny and 2.1% in the study in Płonne. Thus, the results showed no need to convert cattle FYM to compost. The highest root yields in organic cultivation were obtained by fertilizing the sugar beet with Bioilsa N 12.5 supplemented with mineral fertilization of K, Mg, and S (Patentkali). This fertilization provided a yield of 78.1 t of roots per ha in Bałcyny, which is a reduction in the yield gap to 1.4%, a statistically insignificant value. Moreover, in the study at Płonne, organic sugar beet fertilized with Bioilsa and Patentkali yielded 86.7 t of roots per ha, compared to 85.6 t per ha of conventional beet, so a yield gap was not seen here. The choice of varieties was also of great importance for root and pure sugar yields in both farming systems. The lowest yields were obtained from the Eliska variety, and at Bałcyny, a change of beet cultivar to Jampol increased the organic root yield from 68.8 t per ha to 76.0 t per ha, while reducing the yield gap from 10.1% to 2.2%. At Płonne, replacing the Eliska variety with Jampol reduced the yield gap between organic and conventional roots from 6.6% to 0.3%.
Keywords: organic farming; conventional farming; sugar beet; yield gap; processing quality of roots; white sugar yield (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/6/937/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/6/937/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:6:p:937-:d:1415299
Access Statistics for this article
Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan
More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().