Rice Bund Management by Filipino Farmers and Willingness to Adopt Ecological Engineering for Pest Suppression
Finbarr G. Horgan,
Angelee F. Ramal,
James M. Villegas,
Alexandra Jamoralin,
John Michael V. Pasang,
Buyung A. R. Hadi,
Enrique A. Mundaca and
Eduardo Crisol-Martínez ()
Additional contact information
Finbarr G. Horgan: EcoLaVerna Integral Restoration Ecology, Bridestown, Kildinan, T56 P499 County Cork, Ireland
Angelee F. Ramal: International Rice Research Institute, Makati 1226, Manila, Philippines
James M. Villegas: International Rice Research Institute, Makati 1226, Manila, Philippines
Alexandra Jamoralin: Department of Agriculture—Rizal Agricultural Research and Experiment Station, Cuyambay, Tanay 1980, Rizal, Philippines
John Michael V. Pasang: Department of Agriculture—Rizal Agricultural Research and Experiment Station, Cuyambay, Tanay 1980, Rizal, Philippines
Buyung A. R. Hadi: International Rice Research Institute, Makati 1226, Manila, Philippines
Enrique A. Mundaca: School of Agronomy, Faculty of Agrarian and Forest Sciences, Catholic University of Maule, Casilla 7-D, Curicó 3349001, Chile
Eduardo Crisol-Martínez: EcoLaVerna Integral Restoration Ecology, Bridestown, Kildinan, T56 P499 County Cork, Ireland
Agriculture, 2024, vol. 14, issue 8, 1-21
Abstract:
Ecological engineering is defined as the design of ecosystems for the benefit of human society and the environment. In Asia, the ecological engineering of rice fields by establishing vegetation on bunds/levees for natural enemies has recently gained traction; however, its success depends on farmers’ willingness to implement changes. We surveyed 291 rice farmers in four regions of the Philippines to assess their bund management practices and willingness to establish bund vegetation that restores rice regulatory ecosystem services for pest management. During pre- and post-open field day (OFD) interviews, we assessed farmers’ perceptions of ecological engineering practices and sought their advice concerning bund vegetation. Over 60% of the farmers grew crops or allowed weeds on their bunds. Vegetables were grown as a source of extra food or income, and flowers were grown for pest management. Among the remaining farmers, their willingness to try ecological engineering increased from 36 to 74% after the OFDs. Furthermore, after the OFDs, willing farmers increasingly (from 2.6 to 15%) cited pest management as a reason to grow vegetables on bunds, and farmers almost exclusively focused on growing vegetables rather than flowers to adapt the system. While 46.5% of farmers who grew vegetables on their bunds applied insecticides, only ca 20% indicated that they would do so after the OFDs, if needed. Farmers had differing opinions on how vegetables would be incorporated into their rice farms. This range of options could be encouraged wherever farmers recognize the potential harm from pesticides for biodiversity and the restoration value of a diversified farm habitat.
Keywords: agroecology; demonstration plots; flower strips; farmer surveys; insecticides; natural enemies; participatory research; restoration ecology; rice herbivores; vegetables (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1329/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/8/1329/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1329-:d:1453362
Access Statistics for this article
Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan
More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().