Drought Resistance Physiological Responses of Alfalfa to Alternate Partial Root-Zone Drying Irrigation

Qunce Sun, Ying Wang, Shuzhen Zhang (), Xianwei Peng, Xingyu Ge, Binghan Wen, Youping An, Guili Jin and Yingjun Zhang
Additional contact information
Qunce Sun: College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
Ying Wang: College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
Shuzhen Zhang: College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
Xianwei Peng: College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
Xingyu Ge: College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
Binghan Wen: College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
Youping An: College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
Guili Jin: College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
Yingjun Zhang: College of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Agriculture, 2025, vol. 15, issue 13, 1-21

Abstract: In arid agricultural production, exploring suitable water-saving irrigation strategies and analyzing their water-saving mechanisms are of great significance. Alternating partial root-zone drying irrigation (APRI), a water-saving strategy, enhances the water use efficiency (WUE) of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) This paper aims to clarify the physiological mechanisms by which the APRI method enhances the physiological WUE of alfalfa, as well as the differences between this water-saving irrigation strategy, conventional irrigation (CI), and their water deficit adjustments, in order to seek higher water use efficiency for alfalfa production in arid regions. In this experiment, alfalfa was used as the research subject, and three irrigation methods, CI, fixed partial root-zone drying (FPRI), and APRI, were set up, each paired with three decreasing moisture supply gradients of 90% water holding capacity (WHC) (W1), 70% WHC (W2), and 50% WHC (W3). Samples were taken and observed once after every three complete irrigation cycles. Through a comparative analysis of the growth status, leaf water status, antioxidant enzyme activity, and osmotic adjustment capabilities of alfalfa under different water supplies for the three irrigation strategies, the following conclusions were drawn: First, the APRI method, through artificially created periodic wet–dry cycles in the rhizosphere soil, provides pseudo-drought stress that enhances the osmotic adjustment capabilities and antioxidant enzyme activity of alfalfa leaves during the early to middle phases of irrigation treatment compared to CI and FPRI methods, resulting in healthier leaf water conditions. Secondly, the stronger drought tolerance and superior growth conditions of alfalfa under the APRI method due to reduced water availability are key factors in enhancing the water use efficiency of alfalfa under this strategy.

Keywords: water deficit management; Medicago sativa L.; drought adaptation; physiological response (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/13/1446/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/13/1446/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:13:p:1446-:d:1695108

Access Statistics for this article

Agriculture is currently edited by Ms. Leda Xuan

More articles in Agriculture from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().